VFRDiscussion ARCHIVE / READ-ONLYREAD-ONLY

06 Dyno Results

30 posts Started 22 Oct 2006 Last recovered post 23 Oct 2006 Wayback Machine snapshot 14 Nov 2006

#1
I went to the shop today, they were having a special for 3 dyno pulls for $10.00. I have 767fixers mig exhaust pipes on it and that's about it. The bike has 4600 miles on it. I just changed the oil about 800 miles ago. I have not changed the air filter yet, but the bike made 97.31hp @ 10,300 rpm and 53.51 ft./lbs. @ 8,900 rpm. The air/fuel ratio looks as if it's running pretty lean. I am wondering what everybody else is getting. I talked to the guy at the shop and he said that a power commander would really help. I am wondering if there are other things that people have done to their 6th gens to make more hp.

#2
how are the migs treating you?

a power commander is almost a must to cure the lean running. flapper mod for more airflow will help and perhaps gutting the cats. but id do the PC III first
#3
767fixer, Oct 22 2006, 08:44 PM
how are the migs treating you?

a power commander is almost a must to cure the lean running. flapper mod for more airflow will help and perhaps gutting the cats. but id do the PC III first

is there a how-to thread on gutting the cat? im doing my cans in teh spring and would be nice to do it all at once.
#4
Deathstar13, Oct 22 2006, 09:12 PM
is there a how-to thread on gutting the cat? im doing my cans in teh spring and would be nice to do it all at once.



Trace gutted his 5th GEn cat, do a search for that - you might find it - I think it was reposted last week?. I too plan to gut the cat this winter on my 02 - if you find any tricks or tips- please post up! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/beer.gif)
#5
Don't add any more air to it without a PCIII (i.e. NO K&N, Deflapper, open airbox, etc, etc). If you add more air you will lean it out even more. Get a PCIII and get a tune and you'll be good to go!

I had the R1 dyno'd at Wheelers last weekend and it made 128rwhp/67rwtq! Not to shabby for a bike that only wieghs 440lbs wet
#6
phantomx, Oct 22 2006, 08:43 PM
I had the R1 dyno'd at Wheelers last weekend and it made 128rwhp/67rwtq! Not to shabby for a bike that only wieghs 440lbs wet



You know...... every time I tell the local rice that my V4 is really built around useable torque, they tell me that their R6s or 600RRs have 85+ ft-lb of torque. I knoew they were talking out of thier $#@es, but now I know.

It's still more funny to listen, nod the head, and laugh inside as they dig themselves into a hole. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/lurk.gif)
#7
Chev, Oct 22 2006, 09:57 PM
You know...... every time I tell the local rice that my V4 is really built around useable torque, they tell me that their R6s or 600RRs have 85+ ft-lb of torque. I knoew they were talking out of thier $#@es, but now I know.

It's still more funny to listen, nod the head, and laugh inside as they dig themselves into a hole. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/lurk.gif)

heck my 1000 cc V-twin doesnt have 80 ft lbs
#8
With a PCIII and custom map my '03 dynoed at 101.37
#9
Black are you sure about those numbers? (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/unsure.gif) My 04 put down 99.1 after dyno break-in and 104.7 with 3500 miles and Migs. Me thinks they might have had some dyno issues.

Phantom do you have the graph from your R1? Would be cool to compare it to my RR.

(IMG:http://www.hondaofcoolsprings.com/images/hondaofcoolsprings/04_CBR1000RR.jpg)
Blue is baseline on a new RR with no mods. Red is mine after break in and a Micron slip on.
#10
wow - lots of guys leaving the VFR for litre bikes it seems. Guess they are overcompensating for deficiencies in other "areas" of their lives...... sad really...... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/biggrin.gif)

I love my low HP VFR, and if I"m not mistaken - this is a VFR forum - not a litre bikes make my _ _ _ _ look bigger forum!! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/tongue.gif)

Ok - so if any of you have forgotten the feel of a VFR - lemme know and we can swap bikes for a ride - I could lower myself to trying the litre thing...... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/beer.gif)
#11
Kanadian Ken, Oct 22 2006, 09:35 PM
Guess they are overcompensating for deficiencies in other "areas" of their lives...... sad really...... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/biggrin.gif)

Ok - so if any of you have forgotten the feel of a VFR - lemme know and we can swap bikes for a ride - I could lower myself to trying the litre thing...... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/beer.gif)


Ken YOU of all people don't really want to talk about deficiencies in THAT area. I heard a couple of stories after the Soo ride this summer. Something about you streaking from cabin to cabin. I heard it wasn't cold but that you still had significant shrinkage. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/blink.gif)
#12
Hurricane249, Oct 22 2006, 10:42 PM
Ken YOU of all people don't really want to talk about deficiencies in THAT area. I heard a couple of stories after the Soo ride this summer. Something about you streaking from cabin to cabin. I heard it wasn't cold but that you still had significant shrinkage. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/blink.gif)



weak....... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/goofy.gif)
#13
black06vfr, Oct 22 2006, 01:19 PM
I went to the shop today, they were having a special for 3 dyno pulls for $10.00. I have 767fixers mig exhaust pipes on it and that's about it. The bike has 4600 miles on it. I just changed the oil about 800 miles ago. I have not changed the air filter yet, but the bike made 97.31hp @ 10,300 rpm and 53.51 ft./lbs. @ 8,900 rpm. The air/fuel ratio looks as if it's running pretty lean. I am wondering what everybody else is getting. I talked to the guy at the shop and he said that a power commander would really help. I am wondering if there are other things that people have done to their 6th gens to make more hp.

I put my 02 on the dyno in April. Bone stock with 9 000 km, it did 98.4. The Torque i using a diffrent value(N/m)

here's the chart:

I can't remember how to load a pic, so check my gallery
#14
Kanadian Ken, Oct 22 2006, 09:35 PM
Ok - so if any of you have forgotten the feel of a VFR - lemme know and we can swap bikes for a ride - I could lower myself to trying the litre thing...... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/beer.gif)



I am brother Chev. And I am here to teach the world about liter/litre V4 bikes. If you only have the chance to straddle one of these fine machines up, you too will become a believer. Everything you love about your VFR (maybe not the ergos, but I'm young and flexible) plus about 20 more RWHP, and I got better gas mileage than Stu and Edg's 6th gens today (by 0.1 gal)
(IMG:http://hothacker.frac.dk/billeder/billederfunstuff/joda.jpg)
#15
Kanadian Ken, Oct 22 2006, 09:44 PM
weak....... (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/goofy.gif)


But so true. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/biggrin.gif)
#16
at least my liter bike maintaned a "V" configuration...
#17
My 03 cranked out 102.7 hp in totaly stock form, the dyno operator made the first run and said the
vetec kick was cool. He then called all the shop techs over to check out how the motor jumps at 6800 rpm. It was the first vetc they had dynoed.
#18
Dyno's and operators can have a 5-10% variation so I wouldn't worry too much if it's above or below 100 hp. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/beer.gif)


(IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/offtopic.gif)
PS no one cares what your non-VFR 800 bikes make but you! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/tongue.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/laugh.gif)
#19
Very Fast Ride, Oct 22 2006, 10:46 PM
I put my 02 on the dyno in April. Bone stock with 9 000 km, it did 98.4. The Torque i using a diffrent value(N/m)
here's the chart:
I can't remember how to load a pic, so check my gallery

Here you go:
(IMG:http://www.vfrdiscussion.com/forum/uploads/1161571778/gallery_4229_2149_63690.jpg)
#20
oyama, Oct 23 2006, 01:13 PM
Here you go:
(IMG:http://www.vfrdiscussion.com/forum/uploads/1161571778/gallery_4229_2149_63690.jpg)



What in the Hell is that Chart from, sure isn't an accurate VFR graph showing 75 lbs of torque!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/blink.gif)
I wish!!!!!!!!!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/fing02.gif) That's about 20 lbs too high!
#21
baileyrock, Oct 23 2006, 02:16 PM
What in the Hell is that Chart from, sure isn't an accurate VFR graph showing 75 lbs of torque!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/blink.gif)
I wish!!!!!!!!!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/fing02.gif) That's about 20 lbs too high!


75 Newton/meters of torque...about right.
#22
cornercarver, Oct 23 2006, 07:12 PM
75 Newton/meters of torque...about right.



I got your newton meters! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/comp13.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/tongue.gif)
#23
what the H is a newton meter? is that similiar to a farken nugle?
#24
1 Newton Meter = 0.7376 Foot Pounds
1 Foot Pounds= 1.3558 Newton Meter

75.2 nm = 55.4647 ftpounds (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/idea3.gif)
#25
767fixer, Oct 23 2006, 08:38 PM
what the H is a newton meter? is that similiar to a farken nugle?


In my best Cliff Claven voice "Well, a newton/meter is a unit of measurement developed to surpass the length of the Kings arm from elbow to wrist and coincidentally, was actually used by the inventor of the Fig Newton to measure milk displacement." (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/blink.gif)
#26
Are you saying that you have a dyno chart with Horsepower and Newton-Meters?

Jeez, talk about identity confusion. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/dry.gif)
#27
oyama, Oct 23 2006, 07:42 PM
1 Newton Meter = 0.7376 Foot Pounds
1 Foot Pounds= 1.3558 Newton Meter

75.2 nm = 55.4647 ftpounds (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/idea3.gif)



Damn Yankee's anyway! (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/tongue.gif)
#28
oyama, Oct 23 2006, 08:42 PM
1 Newton Meter = 0.7376 Foot Pounds
1 Foot Pounds= 1.3558 Newton Meter

75.2 nm = 55.4647 ftpounds (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/idea3.gif)

but how much is a Henweigh ??????
#29
767fixer, Oct 23 2006, 09:41 PM
but how much is a Henweigh ??????


'bout 2-3lbs, depends on if it layed an egg or not. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/goofy.gif)
#30
SEBSPEED, Oct 23 2006, 08:44 PM
'bout 2-3lbs, depends on if it layed an egg or not. (IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/goofy.gif)


(IMG:style_emoticons/oldemoticons/offtopic.gif) Did you know that the definition of a fryer is a chicken that weighs about 3 1/2 lb. Try picking up a 3 1/2 chicken at the store. You might find a breast that weighs that much......
End of thread · 30 posts recovered Wayback Machine snapshot 14 Nov 2006