VFRDiscussion ARCHIVE / READ-ONLYREAD-ONLY

Just Installed a Compufire Series Regulator

61 posts Started 22 Apr 2011 Last recovered post 19 Apr 2017 Wayback Machine snapshot 18 Sep 2021

#1

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

#2

Thanks for posting up on your install.

There will be a lot of interest in your long term experience with it. My GSXR 750 R/R on my '97 has been working great for almost 3 years now, but if it dies I'll probably go with the Compufire.

Edited April 23, 2011 by rangemaster
#3

Just curious, with headlights on low, and metering the battery, how does the voltage change as you raise thottle to around 5000 rpm? Then try on high

You can see the shuting of voltage with stock set up, atleast till the high beams generate a big load,

Edited April 23, 2011 by spud786
#4
spud786

Just curious, with headlights on low, and metering the battery, how does the voltage change as you raise thottle to around 5000 rpm? Then try on high

You can see the shuting of voltage with stock set up, at least till the high beams generate a big load,

Increasing the RPM from 1200 to 5000 rpm caused the battery voltage to drop from 14.25 to 14.15 it made no difference whether the high beams were on. At idle putting on the high beams again dropped the voltage to 14.15. So it seems to regulate to 14.15 to 14.25 volts.

#5
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesnt regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I dont expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

Could you post some pics of the install? This is on my to do list for my '98 electrical cleanup.

-- Let us how know this works out - you may be the first CF R/R on a VFR.

#6
mello dude
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

Could you post some pics of the install? This is on my to do list for my '98 electrical cleanup.

-- Let us how know this works out - you may be the first CF R/R on a VFR.

Here are a few pics sorry i didn't photograph

the unit off the bike

[image: post-20702-0-15308300-1303574516_thumb.j]

[image: post-20702-0-99391200-1303574803_thumb.j]

The old Honda unit

[image: post-20702-0-61086200-1303574566_thumb.j]

Lengthen stator wires

[image: post-20702-0-49614700-1303574640_thumb.j]

Battery connection with fuse

[image: post-20702-0-27750000-1303574866_thumb.j]

#7
DaveB

Increasing the RPM from 1200 to 5000 rpm caused the battery voltage to drop from 14.25 to 14.15 it made no difference whether the high beams were on. At idle putting on the high beams again dropped the voltage to 14.15. So it seems to regulate to 14.15 to 14.25 volts.

This sounds like 14V+ at 1200 rpm idle with high beams on, which seems unlikely to me. Can you double-check that?

My test with factory components:

(FYI - You may need to cut the volume down...)

Edited April 24, 2011 by pserve
#8

I just received a new MOSFET regulator / rectifier from "wiremybike.com". Hope to get around to the install in the next day or two. My factory unit is still working fine at 40,000 miles, but I am hitting the road for a few days in May and thought it would be a good time to do the upgrade in order to avoid getting stranded.

#9
DaveB
spud786

Just curious, with headlights on low, and metering the battery, how does the voltage change as you raise thottle to around 5000 rpm? Then try on high

You can see the shuting of voltage with stock set up, at least till the high beams generate a big load,

Increasing the RPM from 1200 to 5000 rpm caused the battery voltage to drop from 14.25 to 14.15 it made no difference whether the high beams were on. At idle putting on the high beams again dropped the voltage to 14.15. So it seems to regulate to 14.15 to 14.25 volts.

Interesting Notes and results. If these really are the answer to increased stator life, that would be nice. The Voltage seem to be running lower than a stock 6th gen, so I would expect higher current levels, under load.

But it comes down to Stator life, If people consistantly getiing more than 60,000 mile on stators, that would be a really good sign,

#10
pserve
DaveB

Increasing the RPM from 1200 to 5000 rpm caused the battery voltage to drop from 14.25 to 14.15 it made no difference whether the high beams were on. At idle putting on the high beams again dropped the voltage to 14.15. So it seems to regulate to 14.15 to 14.25 volts.

This sounds like 14V+ at 1200 rpm idle with high beams on, which seems unlikely to me. Can you double-check that?

My test with factory components:

(FYI - You may need to cut the volume down...)

According to its specs this R&R is set to regulate to 14.25 volts which may be a little less than the stock Honda unit. On their web site Compu-fire claim their 3 phase charging system will give 25 amps at idle and 40 amps above 2800 rpm this is with their stator and is of course designed for use on a Harley.

I got 14.15 volts at 1200 rpm idle with the high beams on. So it works for me !

I have just done 120 miles with no issues I'll let you know how I get on in a few 1000 miles more.

#11
DaveB

I got 14.15 volts at 1200 rpm idle with the high beams on. So it works for me !

Fair enough. I don't know how it can manage that, but since it can, I'll bet they will sell a lot of them.

Thanks for the clarification. :fing02:

#12
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

1. The compufire unit has 5 wires? (3 stator and 2 output wires) For some reason, I thought the compufire came with MORE wires that VFRs couldn't use, unique to the Harley application, etc, so I'm trying to make sure you didn't NOT use any provided wires, and that you DID use all provided wires. From the below pic of the compufire, it appears to have 3 smaller wires in the middle and one larger wire on each end of the unit. Are both of the larger wires output wires?

2. "The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery . . . ." You hooked both of the larger wires to the battery positive terminal? How did you connect them to the battery? Tie them together and then put one connector on the positive terminal? Two separate connectors to the positive terminal? According to this post, http://www.triumphrat.net/speed-triple-forum/152623-compufire-55402-regulator-install-information.html the two non-stator wires consist of one output and one ground wire.

3. Your last pic appears to show an added wire to the negative terminal. Is that just an extra ground? Or is that one of the wires from the compufire?

4. What about heat from the compufire? Same as stock? Less?

Thanks for being the guinea pig on this mod!

[image: post-5928-0-67998000-1303677163_thumb.jp]

Edited April 24, 2011 by Misspent Youth
#13
Misspent Youth
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

1. The compufire unit has 5 wires? (3 stator and 2 output wires) For some reason, I thought the compufire came with MORE wires that VFRs couldn't use, unique to the Harley application, etc, so I'm trying to make sure you didn't NOT use any provided wires, and that you DID use all provided wires. From the below pic of the compufire, it appears to have 3 smaller wires in the middle and one larger wire on each end of the unit. Are both of the larger wires output wires?

Yes the longer wires are the power output. The stator wires are the ones terminated by the 3 terminal connector . I cut this connector off also cut the VFR stator connector off and soldered longer wires on insulated with heat shrink sleeving then used a connector block to connect the regulator to the bike stator. I could have used 2 connector blocks instead of soldering or soldered both ends but then replacement would have been harder.

2. "The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery . . . ." You hooked both of the larger wires to the battery positive terminal? How did you connect them to the battery? Tie them together and then put one connector on the positive terminal? Two separate connectors to the positive terminal? According to this post, http://www.triumphrat.net/speed-triple-forum/152623-compufire-55402-regulator-install-information.html the two non-stator wires consist of one output and one ground wire.

The power output i.e. positive and negative (ground); I wired directly to the battery, the positive output to the positive battery terminal via a fuse that they supplied and the ground to the negative terminal. I just used the eyelets already on the cables and put them under the battery connector bolts you can see them in the pic. I also wanted to connect my trickle charger so I soldered on additional wires to the R&R cables rather than try to stuff more eyelets on the battery connectors that's what you can sees in the pic. Using their beefy wires directly to the battery means you don't need a VFRness to beef up the stock wiring.

i initially tried wiring to the connector that the original R&R used for power output but I lost 0.5 volt through the Honda wiring and connectors. It was actually easier and a lot better electrically wiring directly to the battery.

3. Your last pic appears to show an added wire to the negative terminal. Is that just an extra ground? Or is that one of the wires from the compufire?

No that was me adding a connection for my trickle charger.

4. What about heat from the compufire? Same as stock? Less?

Testing stationary in my garage it got a little hot on the road it runs very cool due to the air flow round the heat sink and that it dissipates much less power than the stock shunt R&R. I don't know what the heat is like on the Honda unit but have heard it runs very hot.

Thanks for being the guinea pig on this mod!

It's my pleasure. I've read so much bad stuff about the R&R, wiring, connectors and stator failures. As an electrical engineer I am convinced this is the solution to all this crappy electrical design and it is really easy to fit and as you don't need to replace the wiring and connectors with the VFRness is not that expensive.

#14
DaveB]It's my pleasure. I've read so much bad stuff about the R&R, wiring, connectors and stator failures. As an electrical engineer I am convinced this is the solution to all this crappy electrical design and it is really easy to fit and as you don't need to replace the wiring and connectors with the VFRness is not that expensive.

Wow, an electrical engineer who's installed a compu-fire - I've died and gone to VFR/electrical heaven! I promise not to abuse you, and I think you may have answered this before (I recall being confused by someone's answer to a similar question, but this seems familiar), but I remain confused about the "how" behind the compu-fire product. (All of my "understandings" are subject to correction) I understand the stock stator acts as a "constantly on" generator that feeds electricity (pardon my likely incorrect use of certain terms, here) to the stock r/r which acts as the brain that somehow considers battery/bike voltage needs and decides whether to shunt the produced electricity to the battery, or to ground. I understand it's this shunting to ground process that creates the heat within the r/r.

When I look at the compu-fire site (http://www.compufire.com/harley-main.html), I see: "When the battery reaches full charge, the stator output is switched off by the regulator."

So the stock r/r lets the stator keep running, but shunts the unneeded electricity to ground (creating heat), and the compu-fire somehow "switches off" the stator's output.

1. That sounds like the compu-fire breaks the connection from the stator to ground within the compu-fire unit - is that correct?

2. If something like that is happening, but the stator is still subject to the spinning magnetic flywheel and generating electricity, where does that electricity go? Or, is there NO electricity being produced if the stator's not connected up at the r/r?

3. According to the guru on the Triumph site, one should go to a compu-fire if one is burning up stators because the compu-fire is easier on stators. If the electrical connection is broken in the compu-fire, but the electricity is still being produced by the spinning flywheel/stator, how is that easier on the stator? Seems to be the same, to me.

I'm working to understand these issue and much appreciate your time and understanding. It's not easy digesting this technical stuff without sufficient training. I hope my questions are clear enough, but let me know if I need to clarify anything. Thanks again.

#15

I'm wondering if this unit has been examined by Tightwad yet. It sounds nice.

Also, my bike with a fresh stator and cleaned/greased connectors, and the stock R/R didn't put out more than 14.25 volts from idle to 5,000 RPM so I'm not sure what all that means. Probably means I'll get stranded somewhere fantastic again... I sure love me some Honda electrics.

In reply to Mr. Misspent; I believe you have the right idea about the Compufire R/R breaking connection to ground as seen by the stator. No ground, no circuit, no power production. Spinning a magnet around a piece of wire that electrically floating will not create amperage and the stator should live a little longer and average a cooler operating temp. And with MOSFET switching (I assume the Compufire unit uses MOSFETs, I haven't read about it directly) it should live a cooler and happier life as well.

#16

Today I installed the new MOSFET R/R. Compared to the OEM unit, this one is a bit smaller, and does not have the monitor wire.

Install could not have been much easier as this unit comes with the OEM Honda connectors and is basically plug & go.

With the new unit, I am getting 13.4 volts at idle and 14.4 at 5000 rpm. What surprised me was that when switching on the high beams at 5000 rpm, the voltage went up to 14.7. I expected switching on the high beams to pull the voltage down just a bit.

By the way.....I purchased the R/R for 145 bucks at "wiremybike.com".. Thanks Tightwad!

#17
Misspent Youth
DaveB]It's my pleasure. I've read so much bad stuff about the R&R, wiring, connectors and stator failures. As an electrical engineer I am convinced this is the solution to all this crappy electrical design and it is really easy to fit and as you don't need to replace the wiring and connectors with the VFRness is not that expensive.

Wow, an electrical engineer who's installed a compu-fire - I've died and gone to VFR/electrical heaven! I promise not to abuse you, and I think you may have answered this before (I recall being confused by someone's answer to a similar question, but this seems familiar), but I remain confused about the "how" behind the compu-fire product. (All of my "understandings" are subject to correction) I understand the stock stator acts as a "constantly on" generator that feeds electricity (pardon my likely incorrect use of certain terms, here) to the stock r/r which acts as the brain that somehow considers battery/bike voltage needs and decides whether to shunt the produced electricity to the battery, or to ground. I understand it's this shunting to ground process that creates the heat within the r/r.

When I look at the compu-fire site (http://www.compufire.com/harley-main.html), I see: "When the battery reaches full charge, the stator output is switched off by the regulator."

So the stock r/r lets the stator keep running, but shunts the unneeded electricity to ground (creating heat), and the compu-fire somehow "switches off" the stator's output.

1. That sounds like the compu-fire breaks the connection from the stator to ground within the compu-fire unit - is that correct?

2. If something like that is happening, but the stator is still subject to the spinning magnetic flywheel and generating electricity, where does that electricity go? Or, is there NO electricity being produced if the stator's not connected up at the r/r?

3. According to the guru on the Triumph site, one should go to a compu-fire if one is burning up stators because the compu-fire is easier on stators. If the electrical connection is broken in the compu-fire, but the electricity is still being produced by the spinning flywheel/stator, how is that easier on the stator? Seems to be the same, to me.

I'm working to understand these issue and much appreciate your time and understanding. It's not easy digesting this technical stuff without sufficient training. I hope my questions are clear enough, but let me know if I need to clarify anything. Thanks again.

I know it is confusing.

The generator spins magnets around coils to generate electricity. If you don't put an electrical load on the coils there is no electricity generated and no more mechanical energy is required to spin the magnets , as you load the circuit with more lights etc. then a bigger mechanical load is put on the engine due to the magnetic interaction. As you use the electricity i.e connect lights etc to it it puts a mechanical load on the engine and slows it down. It you do not use that electricity .i.e don't connect the generator output to anything then it puts no mechanical load load on the engine. It is like your electric outlets at home if you don't plug stuff in then you don't pay for any electricity used, but the generators are still running they just don't need as much fuel as they aren't generating as much energy unless you and everyone else has stuff plugged in using power.

So spinning magnets in front of stator coils creates the potential to generate electrical power as you load up those coils with electrical circuits e.g. lamps then power is generated and used the more power used the greater the mechanical load put on the engine.

Think of a charged battery if you don't connect anything it does not deliver any power or get discharged but as you connect more lamps it gives more power that power was always there but only used when you connect stuff to it. The chemical activity that generates the power only happens when you connect stuff to the battery, the same is true of a generator. As power is used it requires mechanical effort so a generator only generates the power that you demand of it.

An important point is that a generator has a maximum amount of power it can generate so it you ask for to much power the output voltage will sag and reduced the current. A shunt regulator works by putting a big load to ground to force the output voltage to remain at 14.5 volts.

So the way a shunt regulator works is to overload the stator so it can only produce 14.5 volts which happens when it is generating 40 amps. So if the bike needs 15 amps then 25 amps are shunted to ground or just wasted. If the bike needs 20 amps then only 20 amps are wasted to ground. The regulator basically absorbs any excess current to ground keeping the generator giving 40 amps and 14.5 volts. Which is why we keep blowing stators as they always run at maximum power of 40 amps which also generates a lot of heat.

A series regulator works by reducing the voltage from the stator (it effectively puts variable series resistance between the stator and the bike) so that that the output voltage is reduced to 14.25 volts no matter what the current drawn by the bike is.

The series regulator reduces the generator output voltage to 14.25 volts at what ever current the bike is demanding so if the bike only needs 15 amps then the stator only generates 15 amps remember the stator generates 60 volts unloaded at 5000 rpm the shunt regulator overloads the stator to reduce the voltage the series regulator limits the output voltage by limiting the current supplied and reducing the voltage not overloading the generator.

Conclusion a shunt regulator always takes 40 amps from the stator running it at max power and so it eventually burns out whereas a series regulator only allows the current required by the bike to be drawn from the stator which is 15 amps with no accessorize so the stator only generates 15 amps of electricity and the associated heat and so it lasts a lot longer as it is working half as hard as with a shunt regulator where it generate 40 amps worth of heat.

I hope this makes sense.

#18
DaveB
Misspent Youth
DaveB]It's my pleasure. I've read so much bad stuff about the R&R, wiring, connectors and stator failures. As an electrical engineer I am convinced this is the solution to all this crappy electrical design and it is really easy to fit and as you don't need to replace the wiring and connectors with the VFRness is not that expensive.

Wow, an electrical engineer who's installed a compu-fire - I've died and gone to VFR/electrical heaven! I promise not to abuse you, and I think you may have answered this before (I recall being confused by someone's answer to a similar question, but this seems familiar), but I remain confused about the "how" behind the compu-fire product. (All of my "understandings" are subject to correction) I understand the stock stator acts as a "constantly on" generator that feeds electricity (pardon my likely incorrect use of certain terms, here) to the stock r/r which acts as the brain that somehow considers battery/bike voltage needs and decides whether to shunt the produced electricity to the battery, or to ground. I understand it's this shunting to ground process that creates the heat within the r/r.

When I look at the compu-fire site (http://www.compufire...arley-main.html), I see: "When the battery reaches full charge, the stator output is switched off by the regulator."

So the stock r/r lets the stator keep running, but shunts the unneeded electricity to ground (creating heat), and the compu-fire somehow "switches off" the stator's output.

1. That sounds like the compu-fire breaks the connection from the stator to ground within the compu-fire unit - is that correct?

2. If something like that is happening, but the stator is still subject to the spinning magnetic flywheel and generating electricity, where does that electricity go? Or, is there NO electricity being produced if the stator's not connected up at the r/r?

3. According to the guru on the Triumph site, one should go to a compu-fire if one is burning up stators because the compu-fire is easier on stators. If the electrical connection is broken in the compu-fire, but the electricity is still being produced by the spinning flywheel/stator, how is that easier on the stator? Seems to be the same, to me.

I'm working to understand these issue and much appreciate your time and understanding. It's not easy digesting this technical stuff without sufficient training. I hope my questions are clear enough, but let me know if I need to clarify anything. Thanks again.

I know it is confusing.

The generator spins magnets around coils to generate electricity. If you don't put an electrical load on the coils there is no electricity generated and no more mechanical energy is required to spin the magnets , as you load the circuit with more lights etc. then a bigger mechanical load is put on the engine due to the magnetic interaction. As you use the electricity i.e connect lights etc to it it puts a mechanical load on the engine and slows it down. It you do not use that electricity .i.e don't connect the generator output to anything then it puts no mechanical load load on the engine. It is like your electric outlets at home if you don't plug stuff in then you don't pay for any electricity used, but the generators are still running they just don't need as much fuel as they aren't generating as much energy unless you and everyone else has stuff plugged in using power.

So spinning magnets in front of stator coils creates the potential to generate electrical power as you load up those coils with electrical circuits e.g. lamps then power is generated and used the more power used the greater the mechanical load put on the engine.

Think of a charged battery if you don't connect anything it does not deliver any power or get discharged but as you connect more lamps it gives more power that power was always there but only used when you connect stuff to it. The chemical activity that generates the power only happens when you connect stuff to the battery, the same is true of a generator. As power is used it requires mechanical effort so a generator only generates the power that you demand of it.

An important point is that a generator has a maximum amount of power it can generate so it you ask for to much power the output voltage will sag and reduced the current. A shunt regulator works by putting a big load to ground to force the output voltage to remain at 14.5 volts.

So the way a shunt regulator works is to overload the stator so it can only produce 14.5 volts which happens when it is generating 40 amps. So if the bike needs 15 amps then 25 amps are shunted to ground or just wasted. If the bike needs 20 amps then only 20 amps are wasted to ground. The regulator basically absorbs any excess current to ground keeping the generator giving 40 amps and 14.5 volts. Which is why we keep blowing stators as they always run at maximum power of 40 amps which also generates a lot of heat.

A series regulator works by reducing the voltage from the stator (it effectively puts variable series resistance between the stator and the bike) so that that the output voltage is reduced to 14.25 volts no matter what the current drawn by the bike is.

The series regulator reduces the generator output voltage to 14.25 volts at what ever current the bike is demanding so if the bike only needs 15 amps then the stator only generates 15 amps remember the stator generates 60 volts unloaded at 5000 rpm the shunt regulator overloads the stator to reduce the voltage the series regulator limits the output voltage by limiting the current supplied and reducing the voltage not overloading the generator.

Conclusion a shunt regulator always takes 40 amps from the stator running it at max power and so it eventually burns out whereas a series regulator only allows the current required by the bike to be drawn from the stator which is 15 amps with no accessorize so the stator only generates 15 amps of electricity and the associated heat and so it last a lot longer as it is working half as hard as with a shunt regulator where it generate 40 amps worth of heat.

I hope this makes sense.

Very nice explanation. Even a social scientist could understand it. :cool:

#19

Good job Dave, thanks :fing02:

#20
johnmark101

Today I installed the new MOSFET R/R. Compared to the OEM unit, this one is a bit smaller, and does not have the monitor wire.

. What surprised me was that when switching on the high beams at 5000 rpm, the voltage went up to 14.7. I expected switching on the high beams to pull the voltage down just a bit.

Thats normal for the oem RR too, if its working correctly

#21
DaveB

Conclusion a shunt regulator always takes 40 amps from the stator running it at max power and so it eventually burns out whereas a series regulator only allows the current required by the bike to be drawn from the stator which is 15 amps with no accessorize so the stator only generates 15 amps of electricity and the associated heat and so it lasts a lot longer as it is working half as hard as with a shunt regulator where it generate 40 amps worth of heat.

I hope this makes sense.

"A series regulator works by reducing the voltage from the stator (it effectively puts variable series resistance between the stator and the bike) so that that the output voltage is reduced to 14.25 volts no matter what the current drawn by the bike is."

So the series regulator doesn't switch off the stator's production when the bike has enough electricity, it regulates the stator's output according to the perceived needs of the bike. I think I get it now. Thanks for the comprehensive explanation. I look forward to any periodic updates you have on your compu-fire experience.

#22

I am happy to see another solution to an ever existing problem. Hopefully the Compufire does as well as claimed. They seem to be good on Stators, but then the Honda issue is more often the wiring and the R/R, although stators can and do fail as well. It is hard to know in those situations which went first. So far the R/R’s from Ricks (MOSFET series) are holding up well also.

#23
DaveB
Misspent Youth
DaveB]It's my pleasure. I've read so much bad stuff about the R&R, wiring, connectors and stator failures. As an electrical engineer I am convinced this is the solution to all this crappy electrical design and it is really easy to fit and as you don't need to replace the wiring and connectors with the VFRness is not that expensive.

Wow, an electrical engineer who's installed a compu-fire - I've died and gone to VFR/electrical heaven! I promise not to abuse you, and I think you may have answered this before (I recall being confused by someone's answer to a similar question, but this seems familiar), but I remain confused about the "how" behind the compu-fire product. (All of my "understandings" are subject to correction) I understand the stock stator acts as a "constantly on" generator that feeds electricity (pardon my likely incorrect use of certain terms, here) to the stock r/r which acts as the brain that somehow considers battery/bike voltage needs and decides whether to shunt the produced electricity to the battery, or to ground. I understand it's this shunting to ground process that creates the heat within the r/r.

When I look at the compu-fire site (http://www.compufire.com/harley-main.html), I see: "When the battery reaches full charge, the stator output is switched off by the regulator."

So the stock r/r lets the stator keep running, but shunts the unneeded electricity to ground (creating heat), and the compu-fire somehow "switches off" the stator's output.

1. That sounds like the compu-fire breaks the connection from the stator to ground within the compu-fire unit - is that correct?

2. If something like that is happening, but the stator is still subject to the spinning magnetic flywheel and generating electricity, where does that electricity go? Or, is there NO electricity being produced if the stator's not connected up at the r/r?

3. According to the guru on the Triumph site, one should go to a compu-fire if one is burning up stators because the compu-fire is easier on stators. If the electrical connection is broken in the compu-fire, but the electricity is still being produced by the spinning flywheel/stator, how is that easier on the stator? Seems to be the same, to me.

I'm working to understand these issue and much appreciate your time and understanding. It's not easy digesting this technical stuff without sufficient training. I hope my questions are clear enough, but let me know if I need to clarify anything. Thanks again.

I know it is confusing.

The generator spins magnets around coils to generate electricity. If you don't put an electrical load on the coils there is no electricity generated and no more mechanical energy is required to spin the magnets , as you load the circuit with more lights etc. then a bigger mechanical load is put on the engine due to the magnetic interaction. As you use the electricity i.e connect lights etc to it it puts a mechanical load on the engine and slows it down. It you do not use that electricity .i.e don't connect the generator output to anything then it puts no mechanical load load on the engine. It is like your electric outlets at home if you don't plug stuff in then you don't pay for any electricity used, but the generators are still running they just don't need as much fuel as they aren't generating as much energy unless you and everyone else has stuff plugged in using power.

So spinning magnets in front of stator coils creates the potential to generate electrical power as you load up those coils with electrical circuits e.g. lamps then power is generated and used the more power used the greater the mechanical load put on the engine.

Think of a charged battery if you don't connect anything it does not deliver any power or get discharged but as you connect more lamps it gives more power that power was always there but only used when you connect stuff to it. The chemical activity that generates the power only happens when you connect stuff to the battery, the same is true of a generator. As power is used it requires mechanical effort so a generator only generates the power that you demand of it.

An important point is that a generator has a maximum amount of power it can generate so it you ask for to much power the output voltage will sag and reduced the current. A shunt regulator works by putting a big load to ground to force the output voltage to remain at 14.5 volts.

So the way a shunt regulator works is to overload the stator so it can only produce 14.5 volts which happens when it is generating 40 amps. So if the bike needs 15 amps then 25 amps are shunted to ground or just wasted. If the bike needs 20 amps then only 20 amps are wasted to ground. The regulator basically absorbs any excess current to ground keeping the generator giving 40 amps and 14.5 volts. Which is why we keep blowing stators as they always run at maximum power of 40 amps which also generates a lot of heat.

A series regulator works by reducing the voltage from the stator (it effectively puts variable series resistance between the stator and the bike) so that that the output voltage is reduced to 14.25 volts no matter what the current drawn by the bike is.

The series regulator reduces the generator output voltage to 14.25 volts at what ever current the bike is demanding so if the bike only needs 15 amps then the stator only generates 15 amps remember the stator generates 60 volts unloaded at 5000 rpm the shunt regulator overloads the stator to reduce the voltage the series regulator limits the output voltage by limiting the current supplied and reducing the voltage not overloading the generator.

Conclusion a shunt regulator always takes 40 amps from the stator running it at max power and so it eventually burns out whereas a series regulator only allows the current required by the bike to be drawn from the stator which is 15 amps with no accessorize so the stator only generates 15 amps of electricity and the associated heat and so it lasts a lot longer as it is working half as hard as with a shunt regulator where it generate 40 amps worth of heat.

I hope this makes sense.

Dave B that was a great break down of how the tw systems work. Thank you, :beer:

#24
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

How is it for keeping cool itself?

I mean when my OEM R&R failed on my 2001, you could fry and egg on the fins (I burned my hand through a leather palmed work glove).

So when I installed the Rick's unit I mounted it on a heat sink plate and now it gets warm, but not hot.

What I'm most concerned with right now is the fact that the Honda wiring harness is causing a nearly .7V drop between voltage at the regulator connector and the battery terminals. Getting a VFRness should solve that issue. It is interesting that the compu-fire unit only needs one positive and one negative output wire.

Still I'm going to be watching this thread to see how the compu-fire unit holds up.

#25
DaveB
mello dude
DaveB

I just installed a Compu-fire 55402 series regulator; I bought it from Chrome-Addiction.com for $173.

The unit is a little smaller than the standard Honda R&R but the mounting holes line up nicely so installation was easy. I just cut off the stator connector and lengthen the wires then connected them to the new regulator using a connector block. The unit came with 2 long and very beefy power output wires which I connected directly to the battery via the 40 amp fuse that it came with. This avoids using the old cables and connectors that everyone here on this site seems to replace with a VFRness.

The regulator gave 14.25 volts at the battery and was supplying 15 amps to run the bike and charge the battery i.e. much less that the 40 amps that is continuously supplied by original shunt unit most of which is dumped to ground.

The major benefit of the series regulator is that the power supplied is typically half that of the standard unit as it doesn’t regulate by dumping excess power to ground. So I don’t expect to burn up regulators and stators on regular basis as many people here seem to. The regulator is rated at 40 amps which gives it has plenty of reserve power for more accessories.

Could you post some pics of the install? This is on my to do list for my '98 electrical cleanup.

-- Let us how know this works out - you may be the first CF R/R on a VFR.

Here are a few pics sorry i didn't photograph

the unit off the bike

[image: post-20702-0-15308300-1303574516_thumb.j]

[image: post-20702-0-99391200-1303574803_thumb.j]

The old Honda unit

[image: post-20702-0-61086200-1303574566_thumb.j]

Lengthen stator wires

[image: post-20702-0-49614700-1303574640_thumb.j]

Battery connection with fuse

[image: post-20702-0-27750000-1303574866_thumb.j]

So.......I bought a Compufire and when I went to install it, I realized that if you mount it like the above pic's the fins are running the wrong way for cooling air flow, yes.....no?

#26

So.......I bought a Compufire and when I went to install it, I realized that if you mount it like the above pic's the fins are running the wrong way for cooling air flow, yes.....no?


I bet they don't even get hot enough to matter.
#27
[/quote]
......................................... I realized that if you mount it like the above pic's the fins are running the wrong way for cooling air flow, yes.....no?
[/quote]

Keeping the RR at the temperature of the frame it is mounted on is more important than the effect of the airflow over the fins. Not enough heat energy could be radiated solely from the fins of these devices to keep the electronics from frying. Even though it seems the frame is hot, it will sink more of the heat from the RR than is ever cast off via the fins. Hence the importance of using a heat transfer grease between RR and frame. Once it was used to eliminate air pockets which are a heat insulator now there are some fancy products available which actually conduct heat (computer CPU goo under whatever name you find it). As well as having the linked surfaces as flat and as clean as one can get them

Unfortunately at nearly 200 bucks an RR it is a bit exxy to experiment and mount one on a sheet of plastic or sheet metal out in the airstream and check it's longevity :goofy:

Looking forward to reports in the long term on these Series regulators.
#28
When I stop at traffic lights and put my hand on the compufire unit it is not hot at all.
#29

Keeping the RR at the temperature of the frame it is mounted on is more important than the effect of the airflow over the fins. Not enough heat energy could be radiated solely from the fins of these devices to keep the electronics from frying. Even though it seems the frame is hot, it will sink more of the heat from the RR than is ever cast off via the fins. Hence the importance of using a heat transfer grease between RR and frame. Once it was used to eliminate air pockets which are a heat insulator now there are some fancy products available which actually conduct heat (computer CPU goo under whatever name you find it). As well as having the linked surfaces as flat and as clean as one can get them

Unfortunately at nearly 200 bucks an RR it is a bit exxy to experiment and mount one on a sheet of plastic or sheet metal out in the airstream and check it's longevity :goofy:

Looking forward to reports in the long term on these Series regulators.


It seems the factory R/R install is not in direct, full, contact with the frame. When measured the temp of the frame and R/R after an ride, the frame is hotter. I know there's been people that have moved the R/R off the frame to below the fairing, it would be interesting to see how they do sitting still.
#30
A by product of the series regulator is that the overall mpg will improve slightly (with the caveat described below). Since the engine is no longer supplying wasted power to the shunt regulator, that translates directly to less energy drawn from the gasoline under otherwise identical conditions.

I'm an electrical engineer also like the OP so I can say this benefit will be realized only if the series regulator is efficient at converting the high 3 phase stator input voltage to 14V at the output. A well designed DC-DC switching regulator can achieve as much as 90 to 95% efficiency. For example: for a 100W output load, a 90% efficient regulator would take 100W/0.9 at the input, and the regulator itself would consume 100W*(1/0.9 - 1), or in other words for 100W delivered to the load, 111W is needed from the source (stator), and 11W would be dissipated as heat in the regulator itself.

If the series regulator is NOT a DC-DC converter but rather a resistive pass transistor, then the overall power efficiency would be pretty much a wash compared to that of the shunt regulator, i.e. it would be dumping large amounts of power as heat. The primary difference would be the voltage vs. current tradeoff. Whereas the shunt regulator would operate as low source voltage but high current, the series resistive regulator would operate as high voltage but low current. Since power is the product of voltage and current, the net result would be close to a wash, meaning both the shunt and series resistive regulator would dump large amounts of power as heat.

That said, if I were to choose between a shunt or series resistive regulator, I would choose the series resistive regulator. Why you ask? It's because high voltage/low current results in less IR losses in the wiring harness compared to low voltage/high current. This is precisely the same principle as used in high voltage power transmission over a power grid. The extremely high voltage of several hundred kV in a power grid reduces the resistive power loss in the transmission lines by reducing the current. In a bike's wiring harness, reducing the current by increasing the voltage will if nothing else reduce the likelihood of melted wires and/or connectors.

A series DC-DC switching regulator is the best of both worlds by not only reducing IR losses in the transmission wiring harness, but also by greatly reducing the power loss in the regulator itself, and thereby reducing the power required from the source, which ultimately comes from the gasoline. I think one can reasonably assume that whomever designed the Compufire series regulator was well aware of the shortcomings of the shunt regulator which is used by almost every bike on the market due to it's relative low cost, and with that in mind designed it to be an efficient switching regulator. For the more mathematically inclined, you can calculate the expected mpg benefit by making certain assumptions about how much power the series switching regulator saves at a steady speed, say 65mph.
#31

^^^ -- Posplayr, you work at Compufire?

No I don't. 

There is now an OEM SERIES R/R made by Shindengen that is available NEW for about $80 from Polaris.

SH-775


       The Shunt Series R/R has continued on but there is now a new Series R/R from Shindengen that is available new for about $80 from the Polaris dealers. Not sure if you have seen any of the posts for the SH-775. It is the same form factor as many of the SHUNT R/R's from Shindengen.   
Originally Posted by Steve  
"Cycle Parts Warehouse will be happy to sell you a brand new one for $67.92.  "Retail" price is $77.99, so even that is well under $100.  If you want to get the official connectors that plug into that R/R, Eastern Beaver has them for about $20." I contacted Eastern Beaver today and he said he didn't know what connectors that SH 775 regulator took, so I wonder where Steve got his information. 
Steve (not me) has first hand knowledge from having installed an SH 775. There are tons of example installs at the GSR. They even include pictures.
  http://www.thegsreso...4&postcount=121 
 
#32
Posplayr,

I have read your post on the Compufire install as well as the links you have provided. Thanks. I have also read the previous discussions, theories and comparisons of Shunt vers. Series regulators.



This whole project has been quite a learning experience and the whole time since I had lost the original R&R app. three years ago I had it in my mind it worked as a series pass regulator very much like the ones we use in telecommunication 12, 24 or 48VDC power supplies. I even went to LED tail light bulbs thinking I was saving energy when only adding more load that the shunt regulator had to dissipate. I understand the reason now for using shunt type regulators with PM rotors due to the high open circuit voltages. To prove this to myself and before installing the Compufire I bought a 35A three-phase bridge rectifier and temporarily wired it to the stator and using a Fluke 123 Scope Meter observed the voltage and it’s waveform. At 6k RPM the open circuit voltage exceeded 100 volts. Wow!

A couple of weeks ago the question came to mind and it is one that I have not seen addressed in any of the discussions or post on the Compufire series regulators. With this extremely high open circuit voltage available what would happen to the fuel system computer and other equipment if this series pass regulator were to short? Do you know if Compufire in their design have addressed this? What are your thoughts on this scenario and do you see it leading to a catastrophic and costly event?

Thanks,

Lester

If the Compufire were to short between it's stator wires and the (+) battery terminal (i.e. MOST FET short) will simply over charge the battery at higher RPM. Yes the voltage is high in the stator when it is unloaded but as soon as you load it with the battery/electrical it drops to more normal voltages. 

So I don't really see any danger, and assume that the CF has to be designed to handle larger open loop voltages. The stator is only capable  of supporting currents directly related to the field strength that the PM stator will support.  Even in a failure mode the SERIES R/R is not much worse than what would happen with a continuously shorting SHUNT R/R (if shorted to round) or will just not regulate if shorted to the plus side. 

As usual, you don't want to touch the stator wires when they are open loop and especially not at high RPM.


#33

Posplayr - Are you sure about that? Near all previous R/Rs by Shindengen that were a shunt were labled with SH -- example - SH6890A. That's the OEM, POS considered the upgraded part for Honda. 


#34

Posplayr - Are you sure about that? Near all previous R/Rs by Shindengen that were a shunt were labled with SH -- example - SH6890A. That's the OEM, POS considered the upgraded part for Honda. 

The website at Shindengen specifically labels it as a "series" regulator.  http://www.shindenge...ro/catalog.html

Go to the above page and search for "775".  


#35

Where do you  buy  the connectors for  the SH775 ?


#37

Where do you  buy  the connectors for  the SH775 ?

Found them ...

Order from Polaris $73  to   the    door..


#38

Posplayr - Are you sure about that? Near all previous R/Rs by Shindengen that were a shunt were labled with SH -- example - SH6890A. That's the OEM, POS considered the upgraded part for Honda. 

The website at Shindengen specifically labels it as a "series" regulator.  http://www.shindenge...ro/catalog.html

Go to the above page and search for "775".  

Some interesting info - thanks.  Looks like Shindengen is developing some higher amp models to that too. 


#39

A series rr made by Shindengen sounds promising, nut those amperage numbers are still way too low.


#40

Where do you  buy  the connectors for  the SH775 ?

Found them ...

Order from Polaris $73  to   the    door..

Not in the UK: About UKP85 ($135), sadly... Still cheaper than a CompuFire, though.

Ciao,


#41
KevCarver

Switchblade!

Any update on the SH775?

Still running it, and why do you not have any confidence in it as stated in earlier posts?

I've got the FH012 in mine, and it seems to be going great for several years. But now that I'm basically 100% LED I'm wondering if I should be going with a series. I put a CompuFIre in my RC51, but Timmy's got that now. Should be better in that application since it's a twin and RPM's stay a bit lower.

Still outputting 14.4 Vdc, soild as a rock ..

#42

I have a Honda CBR1000RR-06 which has the same problems as many 04-05 models and your VFRs, ruined stator.

I've read through this topic that the Series type R/R is better from the life of the stator but Jack at Roadstercycle and some really helpful guys on here have told me that the SH775 will not be good for my high revving bike, especially the way I ride, and to go with the FH020 instead but I don't want to order the FH020 if there will be a new Series R/R from Shindengen shortly or a different make out there.

Please advise me.

#43

My compufire series R &R unit is still working great after several years. I have heard about these failing if you do alot of high rev riding. I'm an old fart and so am not at 10k very often. These units were developed for low reving Harleys and so i can belive they fail with constant high revs.

I don't know if the sh755 has been designed for high reving bikes if it is aimed at ATV's then probably not. Which is a shame because a series R&R will definitely put much less load on the sator

#44

I don't run my bike in the high rpm range, I very rarely hit VTEC.

#45

Not many Harleys are running the series style, and those who have, have been through a few failures. So I think there is another factor in the failures.

#47

I have owned 5 VFRs, a Blackbird and a Superhawk. Only one had a RR problem (one of my two 01 VFRs) and it was a bike I purchased used and the failure was due to a bad connector. Bike was obviously never garage kept when I bought it. Eastern Beavered it and the problem never returned in the time I owned the bike; 12K miles. One of my two 07 VFRs I bough new immediately had the smell of burnt plastic after high speed runs and it had a defective connector from the factory. I Eastern Beavered that and all was great with no more burning plastic for 18K before I sold it. No way I was going to warranty a Honda connector, rather just fix it myself, as I consider a wiring upgrade as much an accessory as an aftermarket exhaust.

In my opinion, and experience, the problem has always been and always will be spotty connector quality. Several of the aftermarket RRs I have helped diagnose over the years use even worse quality wire and connectors than the OEM stuff. If you want a durable, reliable charging system I always recommend the Stator-to-Rectifier Eastern Beaver connectors and stock stator/rectifiers. Any other connector that gives a specific bike a problem I usually bypass or upgrade the faulty connection as well.

My old neighbors 99 Blackbird is still running on its factory charging system after I helped him rewire the poor conducting connectors. He only has 60K but a lot of time.

How bout Baileyrock's VFR. A bad wire or two but no charging parts as far as i know. Correct me if I'm wrong (again) BR.

KEB

#48

Thanks KEB.

I know that the connector from the rewound oem stator to the reg/rec was burnt and as I wasn't sure what to do my electrician friend cut them off and connected the wires with bullet connectors.

When I started breaking down I saw friend and we tested the stator and reg/rec, both values were bad but as that was sometime ago I can't recall what they were now.

I now want to buy a new reg/rec and stator to use my bike when the winter is over. [image: 85c076bc476ddaa77dc4f0282fa80875.jpg]

#49
morpheus20170

Thanks KEB.

I know that the connector from the rewound oem stator to the reg/rec was burnt and as I wasn't sure what to do my electrician friend cut them off and connected the wires with bullet connectors.

When I started breaking down I saw friend and we tested the stator and reg/rec, both values were bad but as that was sometime ago I can't recall what they were now.

I now want to buy a new reg/rec and stator to use my bike when the winter is over.

No doubt the stators and RRs do go bad and in some cases their failures may contribute to connector failure just as connector failure can possibly contribute to stator/RR failure. Nothing lasts forever...except maybe VFR electrical issues. :wink: For the record all high mileage bikes of all makes can suffer electrical issues so VFRs are not necessarily unique. I would never dismiss the VFR for a poor electrical since it is easy and relatively inexpensive to correct.

#50
kebrider

I have owned 5 VFRs, a Blackbird and a Superhawk. Only one had a RR problem (one of my two 01 VFRs) and it was a bike I purchased used and the failure was due to a bad connector. Bike was obviously never garage kept when I bought it. Eastern Beavered it and the problem never returned in the time I owned the bike; 12K miles. One of my two 07 VFRs I bough new immediately had the smell of burnt plastic after high speed runs and it had a defective connector from the factory. I Eastern Beavered that and all was great with no more burning plastic for 18K before I sold it. No way I was going to warranty a Honda connector, rather just fix it myself, as I consider a wiring upgrade as much an accessory as an aftermarket exhaust.

In my opinion, and experience, the problem has always been and always will be spotty connector quality. Several of the aftermarket RRs I have helped diagnose over the years use even worse quality wire and connectors than the OEM stuff. If you want a durable, reliable charging system I always recommend the Stator-to-Rectifier Eastern Beaver connectors and stock stator/rectifiers. Any other connector that gives a specific bike a problem I usually bypass or upgrade the faulty connection as well.

My old neighbors 99 Blackbird is still running on its factory charging system after I helped him rewire the poor conducting connectors. He only has 60K but a lot of time.

How bout Baileyrock's VFR. A bad wire or two but no charging parts as far as i know. Correct me if I'm wrong (again) BR.

KEB

He had a connector failure on the stator /RR connection a few months back. I was surprised to hear he still has original stator with 100,000 miles. That has to be really toasted by now.

#51

What did he do mate as that sounds very familiar

#52

Hey guys!  New to this forum but have been lurking quite some time.  Great stuff here!  Been confused between the different US, Euro, ... models but got that sorted.

I haven't gotten to the bottom of this thread, 6 pages, but there seems to be a lot of confusion and misinformation on charging system, series, parallel, switching, alternator, generator, blah blah, blah everywhere!  So here goes, yea a nerd's plight or whatever...

#1  After examining my bike today, the failure point IS NOT the regulator/rectifier or stator.  The source of our problems are those crummy connectors that Honda uses.  I've searched throughout this afternoon off and on looking at comments from all across the net from VFRs to RC51s to Superhawks, you name it.  If Honda is to keep service centers open, something has to go bad, right?  Not the mechanical, usually, but instead a simple but costly fix at the stealerships.

Having to break apart the connector between the regulator and the stator revealed because of heat damage the following--dirt and debris.

Now here it is.  KISS principle folks...  For the most part, wire harnesses for power transmission can be considered over a short run if designed correctly to have less than or equal to a 3% voltage drop.  At the end of the day and for simplification, let's say that there is 0V drop across the wiring.  Well, here is the rub.  If the connection gets dirty, we will have higher resistance.  That voltage drop across the connection will act as a resistor.  When there is a voltage drop across a resistor, we will have I squared R losses.  That is P = I^2 * R.  That loss is easily identifiable as heat.  There is a one to one correspondence between temperature and voltage.  Now as those points of connection get hot and cook the connector and the debris, the connection becomes worse, making a soot which is not a conductor but a pretty good insulator.  Eventually, the dirty contacts creates enough resistance that the power that should be going to your accessories gets used up in that crummy connector until it bakes itself.  It would be nice if it just went out like a quick blow fuse!  It doesn't.  REPLACE THOSE CONNECTORS WITH SOMETHING THAT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY SEALED--basically watertight.

#2  Getting a R/R that has a higher current rating will only typically make the device more robust.  Thinking that you will be able to get more current, therefore more power is not the case.  Say the voltage is constant; that is what we want.  That means, current goes up if we want more power.  The bike has a 30A fuse on the battery and one internally I believe in the starter relay.  That means, at the end of the day, the system was designed for in and around 30A.  If by chance one should change the fuse rating to something higher along with enough of a load over a duration, the current rating will surpass that of the wiring, at least on the main branch before it branches after fusing to the sub-circuits.  You could modify the wiring harness before that AND at the ground (return sub-branches) to accommodate, but too much work.

#3  Having read a post by Talus, some good stuff but...

     Again, connectors are the bad and the ugly.

    Wondering what fuses to use?  Place one fuse before your branches, 30A.  Why?  Using extra wire, simplified, will increase the current capability of the wire.  If there are three different fuses, what will be the values?  Well, let's say we choose three (3) 30A fuses.  That combination will now blow roughly around a single 90A fuse rating!  No protection.  Now lets say, we choose three 10A fuses or a combination of three that sums to 30A.  We have no control over the proportion of current in each single wire.  The wires are not closely coupled as in a single stranded wire.  Let's just say it is perfectly even though, probably will be anyway...  To keep the 30A rating we chose a combination that summed to 30A.  Any branch of the three seeing more than it's rating, say 20A on the 10A fused leg (branch, wire), it will burn.  Now we have two wires to do the job.  The current rating for each leg will get it done, but, the fuses will not be up to snuff.  Another will blow, then the third.  If the same over current situation hasn't been rectified (pun intended), we will have a cascade of burning fuses.  The correct course of action if taking that route with the three wires, is to fuse with the same 30A fuse before the branches you added.  That way, we keep 30A protection on the mains and ensure anything engineering by Honda stays in coordination (fuse blowing order).  Now if any wire should fail, or even two, you would not notice a difference.  That addition is more robust (more stuff but beyond this rant).

# 4  Series Regulator, MOSFET Regulator, Parallel Regulator, Switching Regulator -->  KISS, they all work well if those crummy connectors worked well.  Getting a higher rated device just means it will with everything equal last longer.  Semiconductors that come from the factory are close in batches but not identical, especially in different runs.  MOSFETs are great for power applications more so than BJT and so forth at these power and current levels.  The topology of the internal circuitry combined with the type of switcher and control circuitry are of more value than just the words if you get my drift. They work as a system.  Yeah yeah, there are benefits to the MOSFET type...  This series regulator that is up for grabs...  I wonder if there is a SMPS (a switcher)  like that in your computer's power supply) for motorcycles.  If there is, I would love to see its schematic and control circuitry!  I bet it is big and $$$.

# 5  Connecting that extraneous monitor wire?  Does it even function?  I'd love to take a look at before and after the connection was made on a scope to see if there were any changes.  It may just be a standard connection that is Shindengen uses for its designs.  Removing one just for Honda would cost, cost more than you think.  I cannot get a datasheet on any of their stuff!  That way, I could tell for sure.  I believe Talus fixed the issue with the connector change.

More on # 5.  The R/R should have a range that it works in within the given tolerances of its design spec and target (electrical operating conditions of the bike).  We should be safe there.  That voltage sense, hmmmmm.  It is a feedback loop, but as many have pointed out, it's the cheap way out.  If everything is working correctly, the R/R doesn't need it.  Temperature, blah, blah, blah, will cause changes but NOTHING is ENGINEERED to EXACTNESS.  There is always compromise.  That is the difference between Pure Math & Physics (theory, not applied) versus engineering.  If there is, and I could just see the durn circuit, I'd be pleased so that I could see some more different control strategies.

ANYWAY, THAT WAS MY RANT.  With these bikes, I betcha a clean and dry bike is a better bike!  Mine is a commuter, soooo we need a simple fix.  I sure like the idea of a series regulator; I'd just love to see a novel switcher out there.

Take care.  Oh yes I'm a budding Power Systems Engineer, not a seasoned veteran and don't know it all at all.  My specialty at them moment, which isn't saying much, is novel buck boost converters, a kind of switching converter.

Oh, there are probably other maladies, but Honda knows what it's doin...

Take care and thanks for taking care of me even when yall didn't even know it.

Now to see if there is a switcher out there.  Now that would be something if it is small!

#53

Hi Ridnout - Well hello to you too...... 

This forum is a great place and  full of geek techies, engineers and mechanix.  Hang around and you might learn something...

#54

I sure hope so!  Of course I will have to filter some of this knowledge through experience and learning.  From past reading, I didn't know the differences between the different models, Canadian, Australian, Euro, Uk...  I was so confused when looking at my bike after reading some threads.  Thinking everything was gonna be fine, only to go to my bike and be lost.  That is when I paid closer attention and looked at the contributors' locations.  Man, even the language is different between UK and US English.

Oh, by the way, I own a '99 and an '04, the ketchup colored ones and going through a slow process of getting them up to snuff.

Great stuff here.  Taking it with a grain of salt.  You see, Talus' fix with the three fused wires with a sum of fuse ratings to 30A or three 30A fuses are a mistake.  Just keep the one 30A before the three if one were to choose to do so.  Essentially no protection or an incident where one will have to like change all three fuses for one fault.  Just a contribution.

The monitor wire stuff, I dunno if it is even active, love to scope the output with the battery connected and without.

Oh yes, another thing-->  I've decided to use a better connector instead of soldering and shrink wrapping each stator phase.  Why?  Field serviceability.  If I carry an extra R/R with a matching connector to the one that will be fitted to the bike, voila, on the road repair.  Otherwise, I'd need more tools, well not many more; it'll just be quicker.

#55

The point is that this thread is 6 yrs old and the info is dated and not relavent to to current tech/info on the topics. 

So relax grab a beer and do an introduction thread of your bikes and some photos .

Btw - a good 60/70% of the group has been here 7ish + years and longer.

#56

Know many from VFRWorld.  Yeah, saw the date on the thread.  Have crummy pics and both are in pieces.  Been thinking of doing one of those build threads, but it wouldn't be anything remarkable; although, I do have one group buy suggestion later.

I've been lurking for about three years or so, give or take.

Hated when the site went down.  I believe I got the concoction from here, but not quite sure for the PPG mix for the Italian Red. I gave it to a painter in town for an estimate but doubt he still has it and can't find it.

Anyway, I'll probably introduce myself correctly and such.  Those that I've joined in forum are CandyRedRC46, Guoseph, BadBilly (the funny), NorCalBoy, and this cool Australian with a lovely white 6TH Gen with shimmering flames.

#57

Who is this "Talus"? :blush:

I have two Compufires, one on my sadly rarely-ridden 5th gen in California, and the other in a box here in the UK.  (Anyone want to buy one?)  I believe the early positive reports did not reveal these reg/recs' limitations on high-revving engines--they were designed for Harleys, after all.  My current flavour of the month is the massive OEM Suzuki DL1000 series-type, of which I have now acquired a few to use on my VFRs (I never learn!) 

I have long been an uneducated believer in the "resistance" theory of VFR charging system failure and hence an early adopter of environmentally sealed electrical connectors.  It's nice to get some educated agreement.

Ciao,

#58
6 hours ago, JZH

I have two Compufires, one on my sadly rarely-ridden 5th gen in California, and the other in a box here in the UK.  (Anyone want to buy one?)  I believe the early positive reports did not reveal these reg/recs' limitations on high-revving engines--they were designed for Harleys, after all.  My current flavour of the month is the massive OEM Suzuki DL1000 series-type, of which I have now acquired a few to use on my VFRs (I never learn!) 

Compufires are great as long as you stay under 10,000 RPM's. My Compufire did not like high RPMs and would over charge everytime I went over 10k and eventually failed after 2 years and 20k miles. I believe the shindegen sh775 is the same way (Series and happy at low revs, but not designed for high RPMs). The suzuki DL1000/Vstrom1000 rr that you mentioned, the shindengen SH847, is the rr to get these days, 50A rated (like the FH020), series and High RPM capable. The SH775 was only rated for 30A.

12 hours ago, Ridnout

ANYWAY, THAT WAS MY RANT.  With these bikes, I betcha a clean and dry bike is a better bike!  Mine is a commuter, soooo we need a simple fix.  I sure like the idea of a series regulator; I'd just love to see a novel switcher out there.

Take care.  Oh yes I'm a budding Power Systems Engineer, not a seasoned veteran and don't know it all at all.  My specialty at them moment, which isn't saying much, is novel buck boost converters, a kind of switching converter.

Look into the SH847 kit from Roadstercycle.com
Welcome aboard, I am a ME/ Electrical Utility Engineer (Distribution). :beer:

#59

Hey Candy, I went to see what was offered but had promised to do the master's program instead of taking the co-op at distribution here.  I've been kicking myself ever since.  As far as Generation, Transmission, & Distribution, distribution is the place I'd like to be, the place I should have taken the job.  Are you an ME that works for a utility or a true EE?  Anyway, transmission & generation folk are the super brainy people.  I don't think I'd be a great fit there, though many of my classmates work for them.

#60
Ridnout, 4/17/2017 at 2:52 PM

Hey Candy, I went to see what was offered but had promised to do the master's program instead of taking the co-op at distribution here.  I've been kicking myself ever since.  As far as Generation, Transmission, & Distribution, distribution is the place I'd like to be, the place I should have taken the job.  Are you an ME that works for a utility or a true EE?  Anyway, transmission & generation folk are the super brainy people.  I don't think I'd be a great fit there, though many of my classmates work for them.


I am an ME that works as a contractor for a utility (Pretend EE lol). My project has distribution and transmission contracts with a few big electric company's, I mainly deal with Overhead and Underground 13kv/23kv distribution, I may get some transmission work sometime in the future, but eventually I want to be a field engineer.

#61

My 5 year old CF finally died - currently doing the FH020AA replacement....

End of thread · 61 posts recovered Wayback Machine snapshot 18 Sep 2021