I have a 4th gen VFR with 25k that I've had for 5 years now and I've done lots of upgrades to it (attached). I love the thing and can't imagine selling it. But I've always lusted the RC51 SP2 and finally in a place where I can possibly afford one that has not been abused. It's actually in MINT condition, first owner, factory everything down to tail light, including dealer brochures. Except for the Jardine full system and a PC3 (attached).
But I'm on the fence because all the white noise in my head. it's a 14 year old heavy bike with outdated machinery compared to newer stuff. Why am I spending so much for something this old when the 2017 CBR is supposed to kill everything. also the fact that I probably won't get much back for this bike in terms of resale value since it's a small market etc etc. Then on the other hand I am a VFR owner and there's a plethora of reasons for owning something so unique, beautifully engineered with a rich racing heritage.
Owning a 1995 Ducati 900SS, which I had bought new back in 95, I can tell you there are a lot of other bikes that have more power, better handling and pretty much more technology than I could even imagine having but I would not give it up for anything out there at the moment. Maybe because I have an emotional attachment or perhaps it's because it is still fun to ride! It also attracts a lot of attention and I almost always get the "I should have never sold mine" remarks. I'm sure the RC51 has the same type of following.
To me, the RC51 is the bike that Ducati would have loved to build but didn't. Yes, it may be old school but take it for a test ride, I'm sure you'll feel the same bout the RC51 as I do about my Duc, the V-Twin roar and torque is something else and a joy to experience. If you don't have to sell your VFR, even better. I find that both V motors offer their own flavor and sometimes I actually find it hard to chose which one I would love to ride come ride time.
Don't sell the VFR, though. The RC51 is a great bike (it's on my list...), but it's no substitute for a VFR if you intend to use it like you would a VFR (e.g., all-arounder, sport tourer, two-up, etc.)
This bike was made before I thought I could ever buy a bike, it's way outdated, and is known to be as uncomfortable and hot as a Ducati. I really don't know what draws me to it, but I find it to be one of the most desirable bikes around. If I ever have the money when a clean SP2 pops up around me, I'll be snatching it up.
Wishing I still had the VFR everytime I ride my Street Triple to work. The FZ1 is better but not a VFR. The RC51 is a classic. I am told an absolute thrill to ridehard. I have only taken a couple freeway rides on the one I restored. Still haven't had time to register it. It is a about what inspires you to ride. The. brakes and motor are phenomenal. Mine was a crashed demo bike that was stored most of its time. Has less than 2000 miles on the odometer. Wife pestering me to sell it. Friends say I don't dare sell it.
I love the front of that RC VFR. That tail section need work though. Would be best if it had the RC51 front end conversion. The price of used RC51s are at an all time low. So many bikes on the market. Perfect time to pick up a really cared for one.
nothing really special to look out for. Remember that SP1 and SP2 are different (exhaust, swingarm, head bearings, subframe, injectors).
also, it is almost a must to have the suspension done, as stock set up is weak. It is about as electrically sound as a 5th Gen, but is easily sorted. Be prepared to pay a bunch if it needs exhaust. Also, it handles much nicer with a 190/55 instead of stock size of 190/50 (but the 55 is the most expensive size). If you get an early SP1, look on the engine cases near the swingarm mount for the mechanic who assembled the engine's signature.