[image: Posted Image]
The project is almost finished as the only thing left to do is to make some plastics to cover the seat-fuel tank area.
That is a large rear wheel. Did you also lower the front?
The pic is a bit grainy (or maybe it is my old CRT monitor) and I can't quite get what you did to the exhaust. Do you have a better pic of it?
nice efforts! I'd ask ya to send me your old 8-spoke wheel since you're not using it anymore, but shipping from Bulgaria would be ridiculous I imagine.. LOL
Here is a short sound clip of the exhaust
I don't care what shipping to Bulgaria costs, I'll send you another Civic wheel for the stock 8 spoker from the top pic in post #12.....even swap.
I admit I had some doubts as to how it would turn out with two exhausts, but it looks cool :beer:here is the final form of my frankenviffer with two exhaust :cheerleader:
I don't care what shipping to Bulgaria costs, I'll send you another Civic wheel for the stock 8 spoker from the top pic in post #12.....even swap.
I'm not interested in tricycles, thanks :rolleyes:
[image: Posted Image]
I don't care what shipping to Bulgaria costs, I'll send you another Civic wheel for the stock 8 spoker from the top pic in post #12.....even swap.
I'm not interested in tricycles, thanks :rolleyes:
As for the project it is finally complete, except for the paint. Some day of the coming winter i'm planing to do the paint job. It's difficult for me to decide what exactly paint scheme it should be, but i prefer something with black, yellow and maybe silver or graphite to mach the wheels..... Its not the best combo, but black and yellow are the colors written in the registration documents.
So if anyone here can help me with that paint scheme it would be great. :goofy:
No more writing, here is the final form of my frankenviffer with two exhaust :cheerleader:
[image: Posted Image]
[image: Posted Image]
[image: Posted Image]
Karhawk, was there a writup somewhere on your bike I missed, she's beautiful!!
Front looks too low, do you have enough clearance at full compression in front?
here is my viffer: [image: Posted Image]
Front looks too low, do you have enough clearance at full compression in front?
here is my viffer: [image: Posted Image]I agree I want to go a little lower in front, pretty much stock height now.
just.... but i like my front not tooo soft and wobbly.
Nice bike, but from that photo only, I think that your forks are way high in the triples! If you move them down about an inch your bike will have better steering.
http://www.vfrdiscus...tallion-viffer/Karhawk, was there a writup somewhere on your bike I missed, she's beautiful!!
Update:
[image: bikepics-2665167-800.jpg]
[image: bikepics-2682792-full.jpg]
[image: bikepics-2682791-full.jpg]
[image: bikepics-2682790-full.jpg]
Btw it was bike of the day in bikepics.com :goofy:
Awesome
A rear tire that wide isn't going to make it corner so well because of the resulting profile differences between front and rear and from a few pics seen I'd suspect looking closely in the flesh most people would see it's not a well finished project.
Looks to me as if it'll be quite a reach more forward than the standard bike too. But what's most important here is you. As long as you enjoy building & riding it that's great!
You are wright! It is far from perfect! I personally know more than 30 things on that bike that need to be finished better or redone propperly....I can do them, I know how, but it is actually a 23 years old bike that i bought for 700 euros and put another 1200 euro in it as parts....
Actually, for me most of the fun in this bike comes from building it. I like the apearence and sound of it.
Riding it is whole another story - i cannot do more than 300/400km at a time without some rest. Fast corners are somewhat more difficult due to the fat rear tire. Handlebars are too low for a comfy 5/6 hour journey. Two up is extremely uncomfortable for the passanger, even for short 100km trip. Headlights are far from good. Gas mileage is not great either.
But having a blast around town with fast accelerations and tight corners, sliding the rear at every possible occasion..... simply perfect. Rear traction is awesome, stopping with the twin 6-pot callibers and 320mm discs is far better than the original brakes of the VFR. And the sound from the twin exhausts under acceleration and popping under braking....no words for it. And not to forget the warm feeling when i stop next to some new, great looking, awesome bike and everyone is asking for the owner of the old, cheap VFR....
It is not a bike that i choose when i go for a bike trip, it is a bike made to have fun with. Somewhat fast, awkward and loud, that's it
that's all.
When i go for a trip i take my brand new(atleast when i bought it, it was :491: ) Kawasaki EN 500. COMPLETELY STOCK!
For what You said, nothing can beat a new, stock machine.
A rear tire that wide isn't going to make it corner so well because of the resulting profile differences between front and rear
wanna bet?
i have put a 240 on a gsxr 1000 and ripped through traffic with barely a noticeable difference. the owner of the bike took it to the track and kept his lap times the same. now i will admit neither of use pushed it higher than 140mph.... but neither will the owner of the above vfr
its not like he went REAL wide...
[image: 2011-06-28145728_zps9d9d60f4.jpg]
[image: 2011-06-28145651_zps4b173977.jpg]
There is a very big difference in gravel though :goofy:
The wider tire is always searching for the highest rock, and is jumping from one to another. Very bizarre feeling of the bike suddenly tilting left or right, but after a while you get used to it.
People who say negative shit about wide tires have never ridden one or are very, very fast guys. I personaly doubt very much the second.
Thank you all for the kudos :beer:
PS: the "Keep what you kill" photo was from one short trip with my best frend. We found one small route along the river. It was like it was abandoned or something. Very narow from the bushes that were starting to close the road, but with good tarmac and good combination of fast and slow corners and some ups and downs. Zero trafic. On one of the humps of the tarmac you could actually jump. Any way, we had our fun and when we headed back we saw a monument behind the bushes, on the bank of the river. We had to stop and see what's what. When we decided to go, his bike refused to start.....and after several trials the battery died, push start did not work either. So i decided to prank him and said i have to go to ..... can't help... sory mate. :pinocchio:
So i leave him there, in the middle of nowere and went to the nearest gas station. Bought some rope and couple of beers and snacks and headed back. When i arrived he was laying on the grass in the shade of the forest, waching the river. He is a true "carpe diem" guy, actually :happy:
I towed him to his house after that and finished the day with some more beers. Good fun.
A graphic to illustrate some of the differences just with playing with rear tire sizes. [image: TireAspectRatioComparison-1.jpg]A rear tire that wide isn't going to make it corner so well because of the resulting profile differences between front and rear
wanna bet?
i have put a 240 on a gsxr 1000 and ripped through traffic with barely a noticeable difference. the owner of the bike took it to the track and kept his lap times the same. now i will admit neither of use pushed it higher than 140mph....
A graphic to illustrate some of the differences just with playing with rear tire sizes. [image: TireAspectRatioComparison-1.jpg]A rear tire that wide isn't going to make it corner so well because of the resulting profile differences between front and rear
wanna bet?
i have put a 240 on a gsxr 1000 and ripped through traffic with barely a noticeable difference. the owner of the bike took it to the track and kept his lap times the same. now i will admit neither of use pushed it higher than 140mph....
It obviously doesn't encompass 240 width tires and the resulting profile, but you might get the idea.
blah blah blah.. put your ass in the seat and and RIDE !!!
numbers are nice and say nice things on paper but behave differently when actually used. :beer:
like i said.. the owner of the bike put up matching numbers going around the track. :wheel:
Fast corners are somewhat more difficult due to the fat rear tire.
RIDE!!! - That I do. To the very edge on my unfashionably skinny tires!
[image: DSC_1651_zps78a9b0ac.jpg]
You stick to your big badass tires. If they suit you well, that's cool. Me? I don't feel a need to go any wider than standard. Only taller!
Fast corners are somewhat more difficult due to the fat rear tire.
RIDE!!! - That I do. To the very edge on my unfashionably narrow tires!
[image: DSC_1651_zps78a9b0ac.jpg]
I've yet to be overtaken at a series of corners by a guy on fat rear tires, on a racetrack. Would love to see it though! :491:
do you think the modded vfr is going to be on a track? or anywhere near it?? :wink:
No, it would probably suffer an accident from decking out and lifting it's rear wheel due to ground clearance being too low. :beer:
But I don't think rc36r has any intentions of leaning it over that far nor taking it to a track for that matter!
Our discussion here is whether or not wider rear tires adversely affect cornering ability. I say yes obviously, you say no it makes no difference.
Has the penny dropped yet?
it wont matter for street riding.
you saw the pix of the 2 cruisers.
1 has a 300 rear the other has a 400. both hit 120 mph around the dc beltway and handle just fine.
so yep, the wheel on is bike is just fine for his needs.
as for your dropped penny.. sorry i am deaf and cant hear it hit the floor. :cool:
Bike looks awesome.
Well done
I was curious enough to get a 160/70 put onto my 4th Gen once to see if it improved handling, but it felt about the same (Dunlop D207 in 1999) but then I discovered that the D207 was an oversize tyre and the 170 I'd been running was physically the same as other brands 180s.
Tyre tech nowadays is such that you won't notice a significant difference, and I reckon how you have your suspension/geometry set up makes more of a difference than tyre width.