Hi there!
After 20 years off-bike, I've again been bitten by the bike bug. I blame it in part on some friends of ours, both of whom acquired sportbikes this year. One of them is the head of motorcycle safety for the state; if she sees cycling as relatively 'safe,' who am I to argue? In any case, I've taken out roughly half a dozen bikes to get a sense for what I like. These have included a BMW 2011 R1200R, a 2009 K1300GT, 2014 F800GT, Suzuki SV650S and Honda 2010 VFR1200F. Of all these, the naked BMW 1200 and the 'Veefalo' have felt the best; however, I prefer a faired bike in order to extend my riding season in Wisconsin. The R1200R has few decent aftermarket fairing options, IMO; that leaves the Veefalo and its predecessors.
A bit more: I'm 48, 5'8", 165#. My former ride was a salvage title Suzuki 1981 GS1100E that fell apart one too many times for my liking; losing an oilpan drain plug at 80+ MPH with a pillion onboard tends to make one skittish, especially if one torqued the bolt properly the morning of the ride. I'm also a trauma-certified ED/ICU RN, so I've seen the effects of crashing. Statistically, the greatest risk factors for crashing are 1) drinking and driving, 2) not wearing a helmet, 3) excessive speed, 4) as an older rider, driving too big/fast a bike for my skill set. Risk factors 1) and 2) will never be an issue for me; I don't drink enough to qualify and I just bought a new X-14 (stellar crash ratings and it fit better that anything else in the showroom; go figure). Boots, leathers and gloves are high on my to-do list, as is an airbag vest. I'm reading some awesome books on safe cycling, and will take every safe cycling/handling course I can find. 3) is almost certainly a given on occasion--this is a motorcycle we're talking here, not a moped. 4) is a worry--I wish I liked the F800 or the SV650 for that reason. The F800 is too 'buzzy' a ride; the SV suffers an engine feel/note I dislike and very vague shifting feel. Both are otherwise lovely bikes that sip petrol, are nimble, light and easy to handle. Color me annoyed.
So a bigger bike it is? I tried the K1300GT as substitute for the lighter, more powerful K1300S; the sensitive throttle and unbelievable power of the GT scared the pants off me. No to the I-4 1300, then! Since I'm looking for a generalist bike that can commute, tour, maybe even play in the twisties, a salesperson steered me to a V1200. It felt awesome; the CofG is down low, the throttle relatively gentle until 5K RPM or so, then wickedly fast; handling feels intuitive, braking predictable and easy, with minimal brake dive from 40-mph panic stops. ABS is relatively unobtrusive. Stability is decent at 5 mph and, well...let's just say it has really nice high-speed stability, shall we? I like the gearbox--shifts are very solid and definite, much like my old GS1100. The seat's a bit slippery, and I've read a lot about the subpar suspension, poor fueling in 1st and 2nd, minimal range and anemic exhaust note below 5K. The windshield could be higher, and Wisconsin autumns demand heated grips/seat. That notwithstanding, it felt really good during the twenty minutes or so that I got to ride it.
So why haven't I bought it already? Let's return to the advice I've heard about returning riders, urging them to start on something smaller, something more forgiving. The VFR1200 feels good, but it's 593# and has 174 hp. It's gentle below 5K rpm, but 5-10K rpm are very, very quick indeed. Whether I drop it or an 800 or a 650 in the driveway is moot; all will be faired, all will have sliders everywhere I can put them to mitigate effects of the obligatory drop. That being said, I like the feel of the motor, smooth yet vibey, and the sound it makes once the exhaust valve opens. But is it too much bike for me? Would a 5th-gen VFR800 (still a heavy, fast bike) be a better overall choice for me at this juncture?
Anybody that wants to opine, please chime in. I'm interested to hear from people who ride both these bikes. In the meantime, I'm looking for a 5th-gen VFR to try out.